On Spirituality, Part 2 – A Measure of Religion

“You can tell you have created God in your own image when it turns out that he or she hates all the same people you do.” — Anne Lamott

"You can tell you have created God in your own image when it turns out that he or she hates all the same people you do."  -- Anne Lamott

When they came to the “New World” the Puritans had a mission. They were educated, adventurous, pious, intellectually curious, ambitious, and sought freedom to practice their religion. Nonetheless, they visited upon early America the Salem Witch Trials in which over 160 men, women, clergy, and even young children were accused of being witches – a crime punishable by death. This was in two settlements with a population of about 600 people. Many lost their standing in the community, their property, their freedom, and some, ultimately, their lives. Nineteen people were hanged, and another died by torture. In their religiously shaped world view they were under constant threat of assault from the devil who took the form of the French, Catholics, Quakers, native peoples, disgruntled or unpleasant neighbors, dark-skinned people, and the poor. Their religion said these “others” made deals with the devil to thwart their Puritan mission. The Salem Witch Trials ended the Puritan experiment, which was America’s first and – so far – last theocracy. In my view it failed because it abandoned spirituality in its quest for religious purity.

In my last post, I noted “spirituality” exists only in relationships. How I relate to and interact with others is how my spirituality lives or dies. I didn’t address either God or religion because they can be apart from spirituality. Although many people practice their spirituality via their religion, today, a commonly heard phrase is “I’m spiritual but not religious.” I embrace this, but find it overly vague, needing defining by illustration. Let’s look to the role of religion in another historical case – American slavery.

The permanent, generational subjugation of an entire race was supported by large parts of early American religions and their sub-sects, bringing their theology to support it. People of African descent were deemed only quasi-human and so, theologically it was morally permissible for European [white] people to own and treat them as livestock. It was practiced in the nation’s North and South; Sojourner Truth was born into slavery in upstate New York. This was not only considered normal, but “American.” Arriving white immigrants conformed to belong in their new country. Puritans, Protestants, Catholics, Jews, Quakers; they all supported the institution and many kept slaves.

But religion also fueled the pre-Civil War Abolition Movement. Among many others, Christian preachers such as  Sojourner Truth, John G. Fee, Lucretia Mott, and  Jermain Wesley Loguen, and Jewish teachers such as Rabbi David Einhorn and Ernestine Rose pricked the conscience of the nation. They challenged slavery as a systemic evil to be erased. For speaking out, many were threatened and ostracized from their own religious communities. While abolition was initially viewed as irreligious and unAmerican, their spiritually courageous, moral voices prevailed.

Thus, history illustrates religion can be a blessing or curse in spiritual development. Some religions are frankly toxic; building walls, defining “others” as dangerous, or useful only as tools to serve me and mine, promoting fear, and excusing or absolving from blame the ongoing use or abuse of these others. Such religion obstructs spiritual development. What joins the Puritans to the later religious slaveholders was their classifying of whole groups of people – apart from any personal behavior – as beneath and possibly dangerous to them. Today, whole sections of Christianity preach–as a Christian friend stated it a few years ago–“the politics of hatred and division disguised as the gospel.”

Conversely, a spiritual religion offers an inclusive, embracing view of humanity, promoting the worthiness of the other, including racial, ethnic, political, sexual, or social status groups outside of its own. It embraces the value of other species of life and the whole planet’s ecosystems.

The religious concept that most resonates with my personal spirituality is “tikkun olam,” a Hebrew term that roughly translates as “heal the world.” In Talmudic Judaism, the world is seen as broken and needing our labors to mend it. This concept motivates me to improve my personal relationships and social actions to heal the broken world. It requires my practice in my workplace, my home, my friendships, and my family. It focuses me on my deepest personal values, including such intangibles as honesty, kindness, fairness, discipline, and compassion to name only a few.

Do I practice any of this perfectly? Oh, hell no! I’m a volatile, passionate person and I sometimes offend others in my zeal to be “right.”  But to quote Robert Browning “Ah, a man’s reach should exceed his grasp, or what’s a heaven for.” My spirituality draws, and sometimes goads, me toward my better self. Should I fall short – and I will – I’m still beyond where I am now. At times my spirituality feels rewarding, like when I volunteer at the local food bank, and other times it sticks me like a needle driving me to “eat crow” after I’ve shot off my mouth without thought and wounded others.

Evil does exist and I’m perfectly willing to call out evil behavior and individuals who have given themselves to it. Sexual predators, greedy corporatism, corrupt politicians – these are true evils to me because they damage others, and build systems for damaging others, for their own personal benefit. They are the opposite of tikkun olam, wounding and killing rather than healing. Will those doing such things end up in hell? I can see they’re acting like hell, but what happens afterward is not my business. As I told people in my clergy days, “I’m in sales, not management.” I attempt to promote a healing presence in the world; what happens to people afterward is not my decision or business.

For many people religion is a source of comfort, but it may not be a source of spirituality. Only when it promotes compassion and world-healing behavior would I consider it spiritual. At its best, a spiritual religion should comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Should it promote subjugation, control, denigration, greed, fear of, or hatred toward others, it has lost its way. Spirituality can transform religion into a living, fruitful form. The loss of spirituality can make whole religions a withered branch, keeping the form of spirituality but having lost the substance. I don’t worry about being religious. I do aspire to be spiritually better.

 Thanks for your time. Tikkun olam. AB

Living as a Healer

While in Amsterdam last year I visited a Jewish museum set in an old synagogue. There was a placard noting the role of Judaism is Tikkun Olam: “repairing the world.” Being relatively new to Jewish thought, I had never heard Judaism described this way and it moved and called to me. There is so much healing our world needs. Returning home, I made an appointment with a rabbi to ask about it. She agreed that this was indeed why Judaism exists. Indeed, it’s why all of humanity exists. It led me to believe humanity is the culmination of an imperfect process and we are called upon to work in healing and perfecting it. We are in school and the curriculum is: How do we each live so that all the world may thrive with us?  

I am not Jewish either by family or persuasion and although I once identified as Christian, I no longer do so. This means I do not follow the religion about Jesus. I do however have a deep respect for Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish rabbi with deep compassion for the needy. When spiritual, psychological, or physical need arose, he did what was in him to meet that need. He taught people to look deeply into their spiritual traditions. He worked to provide comfort and healing, he fed those who were hungry, he wept with those who grieved. He dined and possibly partied with friends (more wine!) He broke the law of the sabbath to feed his disciples because he understood that sabbath law was intended to serve as a restful blessing, not a constraint on compassion. “The sabbath,” Jesus said, “was made for people, not people for the sabbath.” He understood and forgave the human condition, like the adulterous woman who was hauled to him by the authorities for judgment as a theological trap. He simultaneously forgave her and called her to become her better self. As he did so, he subtly confronted her accusers who cared nothing for the woman or even her sin, he turned their focus toward their own flaws. His anger always seemed reserved for those who abused others. The moneychangers who cheated people of their hard-won income he lashed from the Temple. He confronted religious leaders who used their authority or knowledge to burden rather than help. He invited all of us into what a friend of mine calls “the beloved community,” a delightful concept; a gathering for mutual support, where the needs of the many—whatever they may be—are met by the resources of the many. It’s a group holding compassion for others in their time of need, appreciation for the gifts each brings to all, a deep gratitude for when we are the ones called upon to share from our plenty, and a place for those with the humility to recognize that sometimes the need for aid is our own. This is what the rebbe Jesus taught and practiced. This is, to me, Tikkun Olam. So, while I don’t practice the religion about Jesus Christ, I embrace and imperfectly stumble toward the teachings of the rabbi Jesus.

It’s also why I’m perplexed and appalled at Jews or Christians who endorse and support Donald Trump, a man who is the antithesis of everything Tikkun Olam means.  He punches down only at the weaker with shaming and sneers. He gives nothing with his right hand he doesn’t take back double in his left. He courts and kowtows to violent, authoritarian men like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un, while appearing incapable of sympathy, let alone empathy, for the injured, the decimated, the ill, or even the grieving. Time and again he has left in his wake financial ruin of his own businesses and those of others. Everything he touches dies–businesses, relationships, systems, and now America. Our economy lies in shambles and as of today nearly 80,000 additional U.S. citizens are dead while he blames everything except his own leadership. Heedless of more deaths, he wants to “restart the economy” because it serves his re-election interests. This paragraph may seem a shocking pivot from the one before, and that is the point. It is shocking. And I am unable to explain why so many people find him so attractive while also saying they intend to be a mensch or a devout follower of Jesus. I stand baffled and I plan to explore in future articles how it seems to me we came here.

 Shalom.   -AB